On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 05:00:57PM +0300, Dennis Noordsij wrote: > Agfa probably scales the image to pretend it is really higher *resolution*, > and it IS higher quality, but not higher resolution. Probably most users will > think 1280x960 with a 100:1 compression ratio is much better than 1024x768 at > 20:1 :-)) I start to understand the deeper reasons why Agfa don't want to share the specs ;-) Especially when I read about the dreadful things you discover about the protocols. > If the Agfa software tries to be smart and "fixes" a picture which doesn't > need to be fixed, too bad! You are out of luck! And if you have a program > which can do a MUCH better upscale to 1280x960, also too bad, the Agfa > software already did it for you using the inferior algorithm. > > Sounds ok? :-) Yup ;) P. -- Thought is limitation. Free your mind.Received on Mon Sep 09 2002 - 16:26:14 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Oct 20 2009 - 17:33:19 CEST